In
the weeks since Davis Guggenheim's documentary, An Inconvenient Truth,
opened May 24th, I have asked many people their opinion of the movie that features
former presidential candidate Al Gore's discussion of the environment and global
warming. What alarms me the most is not the pros and cons I hear about the movie,
but rather how few people have actually seen it.
I, in fact, did not rush out to see the movie at a press screening or in the first
week of its release. Rather I drove by the theater many nights, each time thinking
I ought to stop. My 18 year old daughter finally forced the issue. It was a Tuesday
night and she was bored. I was writing on deadline, about financing wind energy,
and I needed to break for several hours before submitting the final draft. The
one hour and 45 minute respite was time well spent.
In An Inconvenient Truth, Al Gore does a commendable job calling attention
to the fact that our earth is warming and he argues that a lot of it is attributable
to human activity---too much greenhouse gas, i.e., carbon dioxide from burning
fossil fuels in cars, power plants and industrial activity. For me, a long-time
advocate of renewable energy who constantly turns off light switches in our home,
it was an easy sell. For my daughter, who often leaves those lights on and loves
the new found freedom that accompanies a driver's license and a car, and who will
hopefully be around for a few more decades than I will, it was disquieting to
say the least.
Spotty Weather
In
the days following my early June viewing of the movie I was fortunate to enjoy
some fabulous California weather. Less fortunate were those in the Northeast who
were being buffeted by lots of rain in June that brought flooding to New York,
Pennsylvania and New Jersey. I had to warn guests who were visiting us in Cooperstown,
NY for the July 4th weekend to avoid interstate 88 because flooding had washed
out overpasses that killed two truckers. Fatalities from global warming? I certainly
can't say that, but they were unlucky victims of "unusual" weather.
I couldn't help thinking about the movie again later on that weekend while dining
out at a lake front restaurant. Al Gore tells us that the oceans, with ice shelves
collapsing in Antarctica and glaciers melting in Greenland, will inundate the
shorelines of Florida, Manhattan and many other places around the globe. Our hostess
graciously seated us outside on the deck. There were also empty tables on a lower
patio, usually more desirable due to their proximity to the lake. They were flooded,
however, from the preceding week's unprecedented rain. Waves lapped against the
normally dry deck posts below us as we ate. The bloated lake remained the talk
of the town that week.
Al
Gore, in the movie, tells us he constantly asks himself how he can better convey
his message---packaged in a multimedia speech that he has given all across the
globe---to get people to understand the issues better. In it, he comes across
to me, not so much as a politician, but rather as an individual deeply committed
to his message---action on our climate is necessary sooner than later-and for
this he gains my respect.
The question I ask myself, however, is how come so few have seen the movie. How
come so few seem to care? Am I alone on this? I am, well, a conservative republican
who voted for George Bush---like many of my friends---both times. Upon learning
that I went to the movie, a friend feigning surprised asked, "Isn't that a democratic
thing?"
Hopefully, global warming, or climate crisis as the movie suggests, is not a partisan
issue. Rather, I surmise, it is an issue fumbled not only by the current and past
administrations, but also one our alleged representative leaders in Washington
are now bungling. Terrorism, taxes and political games draw more attention.
Al Gore is already a lighting rod for neo conservative humor and steadily panned
by conservative editors. Many of my Orange and San Diego County friends simply
roll their eyes when I mention him. Separate the man from the message if you must,
but applaud his attempt to raise awareness throughout the country and especially
in Washington to a topic that at least deserves more than a passing thought.
Perhaps
I am naïve about Gore's political agenda. Our climate, however, and the economic
costs to cope with proposed solutions at least merits a healthy debate. Perhaps
the message would have been carried further if Gore were not the messenger.
I hope, unlike many of this summer's releases, that An Inconvenient Truth
gathers more traction before disappearing from the silver screen. I also hope
that you take a few hours to see it…preferably with your children. That is an
opinion also shared by a more famous movie critic, Roger
Ebert. If you can't catch it in the movie theaters, (another movie now plays
where I saw it) then at least visit www.climatecrisis.net
on the web. Perhaps your children's children may one day thank you.
Chris
Gadomski, who consults on marketing communications and web content development,
writes frequently about energy and the environment for Project Finance Magazine,
and Modern Power Systems. He teaches Energy Policy and the Economics and Finance
of Energy at New York University's School of Continuing and Professional Studies.
Reprintable
with permission citing source: www.SMIdirect.net.
Chris
Gadomski
Tel:
914.993.9060
Email:
info@SMIdirect.net